PLBook a call
Menu

AI implementation

We implement AI in your company, starting with one process.

Feel that it is time to act, but cannot spend weeks comparing tools? We choose one task with your team, agree on working rules and check it against your examples. We need you to set the priority and name someone who knows the process. We agree on your remaining involvement before work starts.

Discuss this service ↗

30 minutes to discuss your needs and a next step. Work scope and pricing are agreed before we start.

Reply within 1 business day, scope and price proposal within 2 business days after the call, with the option to end the engagement after accepting the first stage.

Illustrative example

What the workflow can look like

  1. Choose a task and baseline
  2. Simplify work and set data boundaries
  3. Pilot with real examples
  4. Hand over with acceptance criteria
01

Who this implementation is for

For a small or medium-sized company where questions recur, information gets copied between places or staff repeatedly prepare similar material. A first step makes sense when the task has an owner, examples and a way to judge the outcome. If the team cannot yet describe the work or its rules conflict, we first clarify the process.

Possible starting tasks include drafting responses to enquiries, finding answers in documents or preparing content from approved materials. These are illustrative uses without client results.

Company knowledge architecture

One context, many applications

Verified knowledge supports people, AI and communication. After review, new experience returns to the context and stays in the company.

Company context graph: a central Company context node connected to seven knowledge groupsNodes are pieces of company knowledge and lines are the links between them. Each node opens a short description with an example. The full list of nodes and relations is in the text below the graph.Company context graph: a central Company context node connected to seven knowledge groupsNodes are pieces of company knowledge and lines are the links between them. Each node opens a short description with an example. The full list of nodes and relations is in the text below the graph.

Click a node to peek inside. Grab and drag it if you fancy rearranging the layout.

Company context

Connected knowledge with visible sources, access rules and a history of changes.

  • An owner and a review schedule
  • Agreed rights and access
  • Knowledge export and portability

Updates return to the context

New work, audience questions and offer changes → owner review → a new knowledge version.

Graph nodes and relations

  • Channels and tools: Website, Social media, CRM, Automations
  • AI assistants and agents: Approved knowledge, Instructions and prompts, Answer review, Agent tasks
  • Team: Onboarding, Decisions, Partners, Context owner
  • Brand rules: Brand voice, Content pillars, Confidentiality, Limits on promises
  • Products and services: Offer, Use cases, Pricing and scope, Differentiators
  • Audiences: Customer needs, Questions and objections, Buying decisions, Segments
  • Knowledge and evidence: Documents, Completed work, Sources, Facts and figures
  • Questions and objections linked to Website
  • Facts and figures linked to Approved knowledge
  • Confidentiality linked to Approved knowledge
  • Limits on promises linked to Offer
  • Documents linked to Onboarding
  • Brand voice linked to Social media
  • Content pillars linked to Customer needs
  • Completed work linked to Use cases
  • Answer review linked to Context owner
  • CRM linked to Buying decisions
  • Automations linked to Agent tasks
  • Sources linked to Answer review
02

First decision: task, data, ownership

We pick a recurring task that takes time and has examples to evaluate. We map the current steps and unnecessary handoffs. We compare a workflow change, ordinary automation and model-assisted work; fixed rules often benefit from a predictable flow.

When deeper analysis is needed, we propose a separate paid discovery sprint. The process map, priorities and acceptance criteria remain with your company even if another team delivers the implementation. Details: process diagnosis

03

How the work runs and how long it takes

The introductory call takes 30 minutes and establishes fit. We then agree the diagnosis scope, simplify the workflow, design a pilot using real and appropriately prepared examples, launch the solution and check it with its users. Each stage ends with an asset or a decision to approve. Delivery time and the owner's time commitment depend on scope, staff availability and data; the proposal specifies both before work begins.

A team member provides examples and checks whether the result helps. The owner approves the objective, data boundaries and any expansion. If the pilot does not demonstrate value, we record what we learned and keep the solution as it is.

04

What your company receives

Deliverables depend on the selected task. Agreed assets have an owner in your company, and acceptance uses examples and measurable criteria. We identify who updates sources and who responds to errors after launch.

  • Map of the task, data and decision owners
  • Pilot criteria and examples for evaluating results
  • Working flow or assistant with defined access
  • Team instructions, exception handling and handover
  • Comparison of time, quality, rework and cost against a baseline
05

Example first-stage deliverables

This is an illustrative discovery scope for one task. We agree the implementation scope separately for each project. Inputs are a description of current work, approved documents, examples of correct and incorrect output, and a conversation with the person doing the task. Data preparation follows agreed access rules.

We hand over the current and proposed workflow map, approved sources and permissions, a baseline and a pilot brief: evaluation cases, acceptance criteria, decision owner and stopping conditions. Acceptance means reviewing these assets together and recording a decision: pilot, simpler automation or no further implementation.

This stage does not automatically include production integration, migration of the entire knowledge base, company-wide training or ongoing support. The proposal separates delivery work from subscriptions, API or model usage, hosting and support. It names account owners, a cost limit and the person maintaining sources; further work needs separate approval.

06

Data, people and the model's limits

For each tool, we define permitted data and access. Confidential documents and personal data do not go into a staff member's unapproved personal account. A model can help summarise a conversation or locate facts in a document, while people check its output. Employment, legal and financial decisions remain with accountable people.

In the EU, Article 4 of the AI Act addresses measures to support the ability of staff to use AI systems. The scope depends on use and risk. The Commission explains it here: AI literacy questions and answers

You can start writing down approved tools and data rules with our template: AI use policy for a small business

07

How we measure the outcome and agree a price

Before the pilot we record a baseline: task time, rework, quality and operating cost. At acceptance we compare similar cases, including failures and cases that need a person. Agreed criteria show whether to expand, simplify the workflow or stop the pilot.

Price depends on the task, data, integrations, access and ongoing support. Diagnosis is a separate paid stage; implementation, tool usage and further support have separately stated scopes and quotes. One price cannot describe every company.

08

Where to go after the first task

Want to plan your first step yourself? Start with the guide: how to start using AI in a small business

After acceptance, your team can operate the solution. If you need continued support, we agree on ownership of sources, new versions, errors and access before another stage begins.

FAQ

Questions before getting started

How much does AI implementation cost?

The introductory call takes 30 minutes. Diagnosis is a separately paid stage. We quote implementation after defining the task, data, integrations and support. You receive the scope and price before work begins.

How long does it take and how much of my time is needed?

The timeline and the owner's involvement depend on scope and on staff and data availability. After the call we specify milestones, decisions needing your approval and team time. There is no universal timeline for different businesses.

Do I need an IT department?

Not necessarily. We need someone who knows the task and information sources, and an owner for decisions. Technical access depends on the chosen solution.

Will staff lose their jobs?

The first pilot aims to ease a defined task, such as locating information or drafting a response. Decisions about roles and employment belong to your company; we make no promises about staffing.

Which models do you use?

Selection follows the task, data, access, output quality and usage cost. We explain the choice in the proposal; we do not begin by buying one model for the entire company.

How can I tell whether it works?

Compare similar tasks before and after the change: time, quality, rework, cost and cases needing a person. We define pilot criteria with the person who does the work.

Are there grants for AI adoption by SMEs?

Calls and eligibility change. Check current PARP opportunities at parp.gov.pl; we do not assume a grant in the plan or quote without confirming a specific call and your company's eligibility.

Sources

← Software and AI agents

Let’s identify the right starting point.

Reply within 1 business day, scope and price proposal within 2 business days after the call, with the option to end the engagement after accepting the first stage.

Book a call ↗